Journeyman Philosopher

I have come to a conclusion. Fundamentally my martial arts philosophy is based on the self defense principle, while it is framed in my ideals as a buddhist regarding strength.

I believe everyone has a right to defend their right to life if someone encroaches on that, and this is something I believe is taken as fact in today’s age. If someone attacks you for whatever reason you should be able to take the reasonable steps to protect your right to life. Of course what these reasonable steps are is a question all in itself, that which I believe many martial artists strive to eventually answer.

Take the idea of self defense idea and place it within the framework of what I view as the root of strength, that being compassion, and I believe you have a healthy discipline.

In such a manner the belief is fostered that strength is of value in light of its defensive attributes. But because strength stems indirectly from compassion you must learn and apply your martial arts style in accordance.

What does this foster? To me it fosters compassion for others in the hope of further self development. An act of violence would be incompatible with this belief, just as I believe, or rather hope, that I am incapable of a truly violent action.

On the topic of sparring, I don’t think, is an act of violence because it lacks the intent to hurt, kill, or maim. Rather it is the application of compassion through a method of wisdom with the intent to strengthen.

This is I think what I think, heh. I have never really sat down and tried to piece together my beliefs about martial arts before.

What do you think?